Yeah i now think "associated with" are too ambigous
Originally i only plan to use that license to release my own code but when
i open for contributors i will have to take their rights into account too...
Do you have any advice for that too?
Reply to:
br...@perens.com
wrote:
### BEGIN ###
I think
On 3/23/24 03:48, Shuji Sado wrote:
To summarize the discussion so far, the Blue Oak license is not open
source, at least not in Japan. It is possible for an author to
exercise author's moral rights to stop third parties from modifying
the program.
Not a Japanese lawyer, so I can't assess wheth
I think our colleagues might have been a little swift to say "everything's
just great" without taking a closer look. If you're actually making money
you can engage an expert who would take a little more time on this. I'm not
volunteering because I'm generally too expensive for a small business. But
But Apache License 2.0 have many conditions (atribute, state change, etc.)
and din't grant trademark use
I need waive all of my rights in my Work so people can use it without any
worries
in reply to:
atwo...@amazon.com | 2024-04-07
### BEGIN ###
If you have ?I need to protect myself? or submarin
