David-san, thanks for the explanation.
It seems that UK law is basically the same concept as EU.
I have done some research on the laws of Asian countries and it seems
that at least Korea has almost the same concept as Japan. Taiwan's
copyright law is also similar. The moral rights of authors are d
On 14/03/2024 08:54, Shuji Sado wrote:
Permission to reproduce, modify, and
distribute
This isn't safe, as some countries have more economic rights than this.
E.g. I think, for the UK, one would need to add "Use" in relation to a
computer program. You need to be a "lawful user before you can
On 14/03/2024 09:07, Shuji Sado wrote:
"the author shall not exercise
moral rights.
I thought the reason behind the EU having moral rights was to create
rights that could not be contracted out of. For example, noting that
computer programs are exempt, the original author of a work (not done
On 14/03/2024 09:07, Shuji Sado wrote:
~~~ Japanese Copyright law
Article 20(1) The author of a work has the right to preserve the
integrity of that work and its title, and is not to be made to suffer
any alteration, cut, or other modification thereto that is contrary to
the author's intention.
me:
> Usually, in Japan, contracts related to intellectual property rights
> always include a clause stating that "the author shall not exercise
> moral rights.
> Perhaps, "freedom of modification" can also be regarded as a
> declaration and agreement that the author will not exercise his/her
> mor
Dne četrtek, 14. marec 2024 ob 10:07:17 CET je Shuji Sado napisal(a):
> This is apparently the part that differs from Slovenian law.
> As shown in the article below, Japanese law recognizes the right of
> identity preservation even for software. There are some exceptions,
> but if the author thinks
On the other hand, I don't understand why more people don't specifically
mention them. It took literally 3 additional words the last time I tried.
___
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
necessarily those of the Open Sour
Louis Villa contributed this license and is a legal professional, although
I don't believe that law practice is what he does for a living these days.
He's easy to find online. I believe that he even had the cooperation of
other lawyers in making this license, there was a blue oak organization for
a
Matija-san, thanks for the detailed explanation.
> Typically that would be the right to _integrity_ (which could equate to
> modification) – but at least under Slovenian law, this specific moral right
> explicitly does not apply to software.
This is apparently the part that differs from Slovenian
Hi,
I am concerned that BlueOak only specifies "infringe that
contributor's copyright".
Since copyright and moral rights are two different rights, I believe
that in the case of BlueOak's clause, the right to exercise moral
rights is reserved to the original right holder. This is only an
interpreta
10 matches
Mail list logo
