Dear members of the license-discuss list
You are reminded that OSI hosts this list as a discussion venue for topics
adjacent to open source license submissions (which are addressed to the
license-review list). Comments made by members of the list are not a
reflection of OSI positions and policy, u
Well that's unfortunate. Consider that anybody who is developing open
source software in a cathedral manner is doing a form of delayed open
source. The only difference is that they don't distribute the version
under development. I think people's dislike of delayed Open Source is
the anti-marke
It's harmful, but it's part of what people give up in order to get the
benefit of whatever the proprietary software does. Just like you get
"free" OTA TV (apologies to our British friends) by having commercials
interjected. You get "free" web applications by having commercials in
the interstice
Jesus, Bradley.
On 10/29/23 18:57, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
Russ, thanks for clarifying this point as one of OSI's leaders.
Russell Nelson wrote at 19:32 (PDT) on Friday:
We [speaking for OSI] don't criticize people for producing proprietary
software.
Various OSI leaders have indicated that they
