[License-discuss] OSI's purely-neutral policy position on production of proprietary software (was Re: Query on "delayed open source" licensing)

2023-10-29 Thread Bradley M. Kuhn
Russ, thanks for clarifying this point as one of OSI's leaders. Russell Nelson wrote at 19:32 (PDT) on Friday: > We [speaking for OSI] don't criticize people for producing proprietary > software. Various OSI leaders have indicated that they agree that proprietary software is harmful over the year

[License-discuss] FW: Query on "delayed open source" licensing

2023-10-29 Thread lrosen
[Disclaimer: the statements below reflect the best of our recollection, but we can't guarantee that our memory of events that are in some cases 30 or more years in the past are accurate. It is only because of Bradley Kuhn's judgmental and misleading posting that we want to respond.] On 10/27/

Re: [License-discuss] Query on "delayed open source" licensing

2023-10-29 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/27/23 13:06, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > FWIW, I can confirm Larry Rosen's suggestion that indeed L. Peter Deutsch and > Aladdin Ghostscript likely invented the manipulative marketing approach of > pre-announcing that proprietary software might someday be FOSS and/or making > semi-binding public