Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses

2022-12-16 Thread Myrle Krantz
Nicholas Weinstock has made an important point here: commercial entities rely on the OSI list of approved licenses when making contracts. That's good for the OSI. They will only continue to rely on that list if they understand how the list evolves. Best, Myrle On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 8:09 PM Br

Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses

2022-12-16 Thread Bruce Perens via License-discuss
IMO for specialized licenses (I'm thinking of SIL again) 1. There has to be a better license first. Which might unfortunately mean making it sometimes, and tolerating yet another license. Making it is for someone admitted to the Bar to do. 2. The better license must be evangelized to the community

Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)

2022-12-16 Thread Lawrence Rosen
Mike Milinkovich wrote: In my view, the purely pragmatic answers to "why are choice of law provisions in open source licenses disfavored" are: 1. Many lawyers don't like them. In my experience there were lots of lawyers who found the EPL-1.0 USA-centric because of its choice of law provis