Further, since this seems a reasonable change, why not present it to
Apache as a friendly amendment and see if they want to make it into an
Apache 2.1 license? I mean, if it's good for Disney, why wouldn't it be
good for everyone else?
-russ
On 2/6/21 8:29 PM, McCoy Smith wrote:
You probably
You probably want to explain the rationale for your changes in the language,
which in redline would look like this:
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor and its
affiliates, except as required for r
Hello all, this is my first attempt at posting something new so we'll see how
it goes.
Disney has been using a modified Apache license to release software. We have
not yet sought OSI recognition of this modification. I've been hesitant to
present this for consideration because the modificatio
