On Tuesday 26 January 2021 17:07, Mat K. Witts wrote:
> > Yes, on its own. It's a group.
>
> Show me the group then. What/who does it contain that is not either an
> officer, shareholder, subsidiary company, customer, client or
> representative officer. When you strike out a company, nobody ceases
I believe this line of discussion, whether or not corporations are
people, has been exhausted and no minds are going to be changed. I
suggest it's time to end it.
Pam
Pamela Chestek
Chair, License Committee
Open Source Initiative
On 1/26/2021 11:24 AM, Mat K. Witts wrote:
This thread consist
> This thread consists of the list offering consensus that your license fails
> the OSD and you replying “nope, you guys are all wrong”
That a good description, yes, and yet replies like this one don't fit that
description, so that may need further explanation. Many of my replies involve
me agr
> Yes, on its own. It's a group.
Show me the group then. What/who does it contain that is not either an
officer, shareholder, subsidiary company, customer, client or
representative officer. When you strike out a company, nobody ceases to
exist, it's just the legal entity. That ought to tell you al
On 25/01/2021 03:19, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Just to be really clear, the *purpose* of leftcopy is to discriminate
> against a group.
Nope. Company officers, ('the board'), shareholders, customers,
affiliates, subsidiary undertakings can all use leftcopy.
> As such, there is no waffling, no indecis
