Re: [License-discuss] Improvement to the License-Review Process

2020-08-27 Thread Florian Weimer
* Simon Phipps: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:51 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Andrew DeMarsh: >> >> >> >> >> Quite a few people view such a requirement in a software license as >> >> DFSG-noncompliant. I think it would be a bit odd if OSI adopted such >> >> a requirement within its contribution

Re: [License-discuss] Improvement to the License-Review Process

2020-08-27 Thread Simon Phipps
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:51 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Andrew DeMarsh: > > >> > >> Quite a few people view such a requirement in a software license as > >> DFSG-noncompliant. I think it would be a bit odd if OSI adopted such > >> a requirement within its contribution process. > >> > > > > I'm

Re: [License-discuss] Improvement to the License-Review Process

2020-08-27 Thread Florian Weimer
* Andrew DeMarsh: >> >> Quite a few people view such a requirement in a software license as >> DFSG-noncompliant. I think it would be a bit odd if OSI adopted such >> a requirement within its contribution process. >> > > I'm not sure that it would be required in the license text itself possibly >

Re: [License-discuss] Improvement to the License-Review Process

2020-08-27 Thread Pamela Chestek
I will also add that the OSI learned this information fairly shortly after the license was rejected. The OSI considered the submission a Code of Conduct violation and addressed it directly with Bruce. Pam Pamela Chestek Chair, License Committee Open Source Initiative On 8/26/2020 11:29 PM, Pa