Re: [License-discuss] Improvement to the License-Review Process

2020-08-26 Thread Pamela Chestek
It was fairly clear when the Vaccine License was submitted that there was something afoot, the question was what. But we get many requests to approve licenses that aren't well-written or that on their face don't meet the OSD. We don't really have a choice but to treat them all with equal dignit

Re: [License-discuss] Improvement to the License-Review Process

2020-08-26 Thread Richard Fontana
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:07 PM Josh Berkus wrote: > > On 8/25/20 1:51 PM, Andrew DeMarsh wrote: > > Demonstrate that at least x projects, which are not related to each > > other, either currently use the license, or will utilise it, if the > > license is accepted as being "Open Source". Whilst "

Re: [License-discuss] Improvement to the License-Review Process

2020-08-26 Thread Josh Berkus
On 8/25/20 1:51 PM, Andrew DeMarsh wrote: > Demonstrate that at least x projects, which are not related to each > other, either currently use the license, or will utilise it, if the > license is accepted as being "Open Source". Whilst "x" is an arbitrary > number, the idea is that by being used, th