Submitting MIT-0 and BSD-0 for OSI approval is on my near term todo list.
..m
___
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
Open Source Initiative
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:48 PM Tobie Langel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The MIT-0 license[1] is an MIT license with the attribution clause removed.
> It has notably been used to license example and scaffolding code.
>
> It doesn’t look that it has been approved by the OSI. I couldn’t find it on
> th
Hi Tobie,
There was a thread on license-review about MIT-0 in December, beginning here:
https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2019-December/004576.html
It was never submitted for approval, but apparently it was
inadvertently listed as OSI-approved on the SPDX l
Hi all,
The MIT-0 license[1] is an MIT license with the attribution clause removed.
It has notably been used to license example and scaffolding code.
It doesn’t look that it has been approved by the OSI. I couldn’t find it on
the licenses page[2].
I imagine that is has been discussed on license-
Pamela Chestek to Anton Shepelev:
> > The Fair license is one of the shortest out there. It reads:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Usage of the works is permitted provided that this instrument
> > > is retained with the works, so that any entity that uses the
> > > works is notified of this instrument.
>
