To Russel Nelson,
Thank you very much for your suggestions and feedback. I have not heard of
The Incredible Secret Money Machine, but I will definitely look into it.
Also, I think your suggestion on extensive publication falls in line very
well already with my current activities and goals. Right n
McCoy Smith,
Thank you for your response and suggestion, I will certainly reach out to
OSHWA and see if there is any additional information there. I will also
probably try to reach out to some other well known open source
hardware-based companies like Arduino and Prusa, and ask them ideas on
their
On 3/4/20 2:30 PM, Michael Bretti wrote:
4. How can open source innovation be protected? Especially in my case
were I am working on very high-tech systems in a highly competitive,
and normally very secretive and non-transparent field, how can I make
sure that I get credit, or protect myself fro
May I recommend Don Lancaster's The Incredible Secret Money Machine?
On 3/4/20 2:30 PM, Michael Bretti wrote:
As I progress into more high performance and potentially innovative
systems however, I increasingly need to worry about protecting myself
and my work from competition, being open-sour
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:28 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just say that, for example, we were having this discussion 10 years ago,
> and that the elephant in the room, as persona-non-grata was Microsoft. And
> say that there was s/w that was under such an ethical license that
> prevented or severely
You probably want to direct your questions to the Open Source Hardware
Association (OSHWA) https://www.oshwa.org/
They have bulletin boards similar to this mailing list:
https://community.oshwa.org/
From: License-discuss On Behalf
Of Michael Bretti
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:30
Moving to license-discuss since the license has been approved.
Pam
Pamela Chestek
Chair, License Review Committee
Open Source Initiative
On 3/4/2020 11:00 AM, Ian Kelling wrote:
> VanL writes:
>
>> Hello Ian,
>>
>> Thanks for chiming in. A couple responses:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 8:50 AM
I have some thoughts of my own regarding the ethical licensing movement.
I hope we can promote a more civil discussion among peers, rather than
between opponents.
Firstly, I completely acknowledge the concerns of those who would put
ethical clauses in their licenses. I believe that the values on d
To The Open Source License Discussion Group,
I was recently referred to this mailing group by a member of the Open
Research Institute, who has been a fantastic help and resource regarding my
questions and concerns about open source approaches in general. As some
background, I am currently the only
On 3/6/20 10:07 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Again, I personally like the idea of ethical open source, but I don't see how
it fits into the OSD, nor should it. As an external branch, ala InnerSource, it
makes better sense.
I do NOT like the idea of ethical open source. It completely turns the
id
> On Mar 6, 2020, at 3:52 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Eric Schultz:
>
>> Description:
>> The idea for Dual Licensing for Justice comes from, you guessed it, dual
>> licensing and my own experience with the [license for the Houdini Project](
>> https://github.com/houdiniproject/houdini/blo
* Eric Schultz:
> Description:
> The idea for Dual Licensing for Justice comes from, you guessed it, dual
> licensing and my own experience with the [license for the Houdini Project](
> https://github.com/houdiniproject/houdini/blob/master/LICENSE) which I help
> lead. It's additionally inspired b
12 matches
Mail list logo
