On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 11:51 AM Gil Yehuda via License-discuss <
license-discuss@lists.opensource.org> wrote:
> Thank you Stuart, you are right. The fear of losing control is a big part
> of this. Josh, indeed. All code is based on other code. This is why there's
> such a conflict. Russel, I'm ask
On 3/1/2020 5:58 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Is that so in the USA? Here it reads more like the exclusive exploitation
> rights belong to the employer when done as part of hired work, but the
> moral rights belong to the natural person who created it.
There is no legally cognizable moral right i
Gil Yehuda via License-discuss dixit:
>Sometimes she'll say, "but it's my code." and I'll say, technically it's
This is weird. I can differentiate between author and licensor.
>work for hire that you assigned the copyrights to the company, but I
Is that so in the USA? Here it reads more like th
Gil,
Thanks for asking the question; it is a topic that has always fascinated
me. My belief based on my personal experience only is that software may
be unusual in authors /not/ feeling that they have a strong sense of
ownership of their work, regardless of who the legal owner is. I learned
v
Thank you Stuart, you are right. The fear of losing control is a big part
of this. Josh, indeed. All code is based on other code. This is why there's
such a conflict. Russel, I'm asking about all code authors because there
are many ways to view this.
A few times a year I get a report of code on Gi
