Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

2019-08-29 Thread Bruce Perens via License-discuss
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:30 AM Henrik Ingo wrote: > I was lazy and didn't include a link, but I was really referencing - if > not exactly quoting - your own words from March: > https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2019-March/004014.html > > It seems your mi

Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

2019-08-29 Thread Henrik Ingo
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:27 PM Bruce Perens wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 2:10 AM Henrik Ingo > wrote: > >> >> I was expecting you to also say that "we can't give FSF monopoly to >> decide the boundaries of copyleft" and "OSI was founded to be inclusive >> also to the needs of commercial compa

Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

2019-08-29 Thread Bruce Perens via License-discuss
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 2:10 AM Henrik Ingo wrote: > > I was expecting you to also say that "we can't give FSF monopoly to decide > the boundaries of copyleft" and "OSI was founded to be inclusive also to > the needs of commercial companies". Surely this omission was just an error? > Heck no. I ha

Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

2019-08-29 Thread Henrik Ingo
Bruce On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:01 AM Bruce Perens via License-review < license-rev...@lists.opensource.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 3:08 PM VanL wrote: > >> I am a supporter of the OSI. I think the OSI is important, and that it >> serves an important function. But I can also see that s