I've incorporated several new suggestions and attached the new draft as
plaintext.
- More verbose initial paragraph that's explicit about both copyright and
patent license grants
- copyright notice -> contributor notice
- "use or distribute this software with it" in clause 2 -> "use the hereby
On Monday, 5 August 2019 19:34:39 CEST Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock wrote:
> A few points that could do with some thought and possibly clarification:
>
> It doesn't seem like this license requires distribution of source code. It
> seems like the original author could distribute an application
A few points that could do with some thought and possibly clarification:
It doesn't seem like this license requires distribution of source code. It
seems like the original author could distribute an application only as a
precompiled binary, in which case subsequent recipients/modifiers would al
On Monday, 5 August 2019 15:23:57 CEST Pamela Chestek wrote:
> You've added confusion with these two new paragraphs:
>
>You are granted a perpetual, universal, non-exclusive,
> no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except by not
> fulfilling the above obligations) copyright
You've added confusion with these two new paragraphs:
You are granted a perpetual, universal, non-exclusive,
no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except by not
fulfilling the above obligations) copyright license to use
and distribute this software without restrictio
