Re: [License-discuss] Intimacy in open source

2019-01-14 Thread John Cowan
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 1:02 PM Lawrence Rosen wrote: What is the relevance of "convoluted interaction" and "deep knowledge," and > why should open source licenses care about independent implementations > regardless of their design for utility? > I think (but don't actually know) that it was int

Re: [License-discuss] Intimacy in open source

2019-01-14 Thread Lawrence Rosen
Scott Peterson wrote: > “Intimate” is the most useful term we know to describe the kind of convoluted > interaction and deep knowledge that suggests that one part is specifically > designed to require another part. What is the relevance of "convoluted interaction" and "deep knowledge," and w

Re: [License-discuss] Intimacy in open source

2019-01-14 Thread Scott Peterson
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:43 AM Gil Yehuda via License-discuss < license-discuss@lists.opensource.org> wrote: > First time posting to this group. I hope the subject line got you to read > further. I'm not asking for legal advise, but posing a question about a > phrase used in AGPL/GPL v3.0 and ho