On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:37 PM, B Galliart wrote:
> (1) What advocacy information does the Open Source Initiative provide
> which indicates it is possible to protect the commercial viability of a
> product when honoring the Open Source Definition?
>
Such a thing is hardly necessary any more.
B Galliart dixit:
>but still wants to market their limited license code as Open Source, what
It’s not Open Source.
There actually *is* a term for what they are doing
(providing source code access under non-free terms):
“Shared Source”
bye,
//mirabilos
--
I believe no one can invent an algorit
A couple months ago, I evaluated Pritunl, the "Open Source Enterprise
Distributed OpenVPN and IPsec Server"
The primary web page is available here:
https://pritunl.com/
The github project is available here:
https://github.com/pritunl/pritunl
The license is available here:
https://github.com/prit
