[rt.cpan.org #43841] Win32::Clipboard::WaitForChange() doesn't wait

2009-03-04 Thread K. Wittrock via RT
Wed Mar 04 12:23:21 2009: Request 43841 was acted upon. Transaction: Ticket created by kwittr...@web.de Queue: Win32-Clipboard Subject: Win32::Clipboard::WaitForChange() doesn't wait Broken in: (no value) Severity: (no value) Owner: Nobody Requestors: kwittr...@web.de

[rt.cpan.org #43889] Win32::Clipboard::GetText() doesn't convert newlines

2009-03-06 Thread K. Wittrock via RT
Thu Mar 05 16:45:46 2009: Request 43889 was acted upon. Transaction: Ticket created by kwittr...@web.de Queue: Win32-Clipboard Subject: Win32::Clipboard::GetText() doesn't convert newlines Broken in: (no value) Severity: (no value) Owner: Nobody Requestors: kwittr...@web

Re: [rt.cpan.org #43889] Win32::Clipboard::GetText() doesn't convert newlines

2009-03-09 Thread K. Wittrock via RT
() doesn't convert newlines > http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=43889 > > > K. Wittrock via RT wrote: >> >> MS Windows uses \r\n for Newline, while Perl uses \n. So >> Win32::Clipboard::GetText() >> should perform a "$text =~ s/\r$//mg;"

Re: [rt.cpan.org #43889] Win32::Clipboard::GetText() doesn't convert newlines

2009-03-09 Thread K. Wittrock via RT
() doesn't convert newlines https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=43889 > > K. Wittrock via RT wrote: >> >> A \n without a preceeding \r is not a line end marker on Windows. It is not >> touched by my suggestion (note the $ and the mg in >> the >&g

Re: [rt.cpan.org #43889] Win32::Clipboard::GetText() doesn't convert newlines

2009-03-09 Thread K. Wittrock via RT
() doesn't convert newlines https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=43889 > > K. Wittrock via RT wrote: >> >> Perl developers are often anxious about backward compatibility. Ok, go ahead. > > Go ahead and what ? I'm not the maintainer - just another user. >

Re: [rt.cpan.org #43889] Win32::Clipboard::GetText() doesn't convert newlines

2009-03-11 Thread K. Wittrock via RT
:GetText() doesn't convert newlines https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=43889 > >> K. Wittrock via RT wrote: >> > Perl developers are often anxious about backward compatibility. Ok, >> > go ahead. >> >> Go ahead and what ? I'm not the maintain