On 05/14/2012 11:33, bulk 88 wrote:
I'm going to restart this discussion at
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=970481 . I hope more pairs of eyes see there
and respond there.
I can't log in there at the moment - won't take my password or email me a new
one.
Wouldn't something like this work
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:44:30 -0700
> From: dbec...@roadrunner.com
> To: bul...@hotmail.com
> CC: libwin32@perl.org
> Subject: Re: 3 Win32::API bugs
>
..
> This would also not break Win32::API::Prototype which would also
>
On 05/16/2012 12:35, bulk 88 wrote:
I would rather not change the dll parameter to a dual purpose ref or non ref, its not
obvious what the code is doing then. Someone might ask does Win32::API correct
"unnormalized" dll names now or returns the full path name of the DLL loaded
from a relative
I reached an interesting problem. I added buffer overflow protection to SVPV
pointer types. Win32::API's own test suite died from a buffer overflow here
https://github.com/cosimo/perl5-win32-api/blob/45847136293a8d6939fc319f91702d0b91287726/t/00_API.t#L115
. The sentinal pattern is 2 wide nulls
