RE: Win32-IPC-1.06 fails to define INFINITE

2008-04-16 Thread Jan Dubois
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Jan Dubois wrote: > | Now that I'm typing this, I have one other idea though: if the module > | links against a different runtime library than perl58.dll, then the Just to be clear, what I mean is that IPC.dll links against e.g. MSVCR71.dll while perl58.dll links against MSVCR

RE: Win32-IPC-1.06 fails to define INFINITE

2008-04-16 Thread Jan Dubois
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Christopher J. Madsen wrote: > > Does anybody have any idea what could cause this? It's impossible for > the DLL not to define INFINITE. It's no longer a conditional > compilation; if INFINITE is not defined, the code won't compile. > > The only thing I can think of is that

Re: Win32-IPC-1.06 fails to define INFINITE

2008-04-16 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . . or a bug in ExtUtils::CBuilder (which is my hunch) . . Yep, I think Iwas right - downgrading from ExtUtils::CBuilder-0.22 (which failed its test suite, and should therefore have not been installed in the first place) to

Re: Win32-IPC-1.06 fails to define INFINITE

2008-04-16 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Christopher J. Madsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:22 PM Subject: Win32-IPC-1.06 fails to define INFINITE Does anybody have any idea what could cause this? Beats me - I can't reproduce the problem

Win32-IPC-1.06 fails to define INFINITE

2008-04-16 Thread Christopher J. Madsen
Does anybody have any idea what could cause this? It's impossible for the DLL not to define INFINITE. It's no longer a conditional compilation; if INFINITE is not defined, the code won't compile. The only thing I can think of is that $! isn't getting set properly, but I don't know how that c