I haven't heard much of anything from Curtis recently, and our last
few releases are very late or missing.
I'll look at getting more involved again in development and look at a
new release.
Adam K
On 29 August 2011 06:06, Cosimo Streppone via RT
wrote:
> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?
Wed Sep 07 17:13:51 2011: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by a...@ali.as
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: COSIMO
Requestors
Tue Jan 25 05:11:53 2011: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by stephen.benn...@accelrys.com
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Thu Jan 20 04:55:09 2011: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by stephen.benn...@accelrys.com
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Mon Jul 12 11:52:56 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sbenn...@accelrys.com
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: COSIMO
Mon Jul 12 12:03:38 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by k...@volny.cz
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: COSIMO
Fri Jul 09 11:00:45 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sbenn...@accelrys.com
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: COSIMO
Mon May 10 08:19:17 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Mon May 10 15:08:35 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by j...@activestate.com
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: COSIMO
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Sisyphus wrote:
> The compiler I'm using (which is the same compiler that ActiveState used to
> build their x64 perl) is not strictly an MSVC++ compiler - it's the
> "Microsoft Platform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2".
>
> Jan reckons it's still freely available, and he's prob
- Original Message -
From: "Cosimo Streppone via RT"
Please send me your API_test64.dll.
Sure - I'll send it to you offlist. (Anyone else wants one just let me
know.)
Otherwise, when trying to compile the obj file,
(by which I meant that when I ran 'cl -c API_test.cpp')
I
Sun May 09 08:50:52 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
- Original Message -
From: "Sisyphus"
In any case, I'll try to rebuild the API_test64.dll when I get the time -
as that will probably fix the problem, irrespective of the cause. (I'll
get back when I've tested that out.)
Yes, I think that fixes the problem. The only test script th
Wed May 05 06:48:44 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sbenn...@accelrys.com
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: COSIMO
Wed Apr 28 05:43:10 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Bennett"
To: "Sisyphus" ;
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Sorry - just so that there's no doubt, the dll that's be
Wed Apr 28 04:51:22 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sbenn...@accelrys.com
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: COSIMO
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Bennett"
To: "Sisyphus" ;
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:01 AM
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Apologies for the delayed reply -- I was rather busy at the time and th
> Sorry - just so that there's no doubt, the dll that's being accessed is
> API_test64.dll (though you probably deduced as much from the test output I
> posted :-)
Is it possible that that DLL got garbled in the passage through patches, RT,
etc? I'd try rebuilding it locally, if you can.
Accelry
Wed Apr 28 03:32:13 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
- Original Message -
From: "Sisyphus"
which I guess means that the dll being accessed ("our own DLL") is not to
my compiler's liking.
Sorry - just so that there's no doubt, the dll that's being accessed is
API_test64.dll (though you probably deduced as much from the test output I
Mon Apr 26 18:01:24 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sbenn...@accelrys.com
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: RE: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: COSIMO
Fri Apr 02 01:44:09 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
Fri Apr 02 01:12:25 2010: Request 55660 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by sisyph...@optusnet.com.au
Queue: Win32-API
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for
Win32::API
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
- Original Message -
From: "Sisyphus"
I'll try and get hold of a suitable ml.exe.
Duh - I already have one. But it's called ml64.exe, not ml.exe.
Anyway, renaming ml64.exe to ml.exe (temporarily) allows the build to
complete.
For me, There are some failing tests (including a c
- Original Message -
From: "Cosimo Streppone via RT"
Cc: ; ;
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 12:05 AM
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #55660] [PATCH] Partial win64 support for Win32::API
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=55660 >
Hi Stephen,
thanks for your great work again.
I had som
26 matches
Mail list logo
