> To: bul...@hotmail.com
> CC: libwin32@perl.org; modu...@perl.org
> Subject: Re: "Win32::API::Callback::IATPatch" name for DLL/SO hooker for
> Win32::API
> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:25:31 +0200
> From: cos...@streppone.it
>
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:12:5
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:12:50 +0200, Cosimo Streppone
wrote:
I'll have a look at your pull request and
reply within 24 hours.
Your pull request is now fully merged.
I have looked at the commits and it's clear
that this is way over my head now.
I think it makes sense to give you co-maint of
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:18:27 +0200, bulk 88 wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:09:48 +0200
> From: cos...@streppone.it
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it's great that you're trying to push Win32::API forward.
>
> However, having 2 separate Win32::API releases in CPAN
> is not good IMHO, because it creates
> From: bul...@hotmail.com
> To: cos...@streppone.it; libwin32@perl.org; j...@activestate.com
> Subject: RE: "Win32::API::Callback::IATPatch" name for DLL/SO hooker for
> Win32::API
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:48:34 -0400
>
>
>
>
> > To: libwin32@perl.or
