Re: ignored ?

2023-05-16 Thread Peter Krempa
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 20:14:58 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > > > On 15/05/2023 19:14, Marc wrote: > > > Is there something else which is a prerequisite to 'qemu:commandline' > > > but if yes and I'm missing those, why would not then 'virsh' and/or > > > 'virtqemud' say something? > > No what you hav

Re: ignored ?

2023-05-16 Thread lejeczek
On 16/05/2023 09:08, Peter Krempa wrote: On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 20:14:58 +0200, lejeczek wrote: On 15/05/2023 19:14, Marc wrote: Is there something else which is a prerequisite to 'qemu:commandline' but if yes and I'm missing those, why would not then 'virsh' and/or 'virtqemud' say somethi

Re: ignored ?

2023-05-16 Thread Michal Prívozník
On 5/15/23 19:07, lejeczek wrote: > Hi guys. > > I have a domain definition with this: > ... >   >     >     value='name=opt/com.coreos/config,file=/00-VMs/oshift1node.ign'/> >   > > > at the bottom of xml. > 'virsh' creates domain a okey but in VM I do not see ignition happened - > it's fed

Re: ignored ?

2023-05-16 Thread lejeczek
On 16/05/2023 10:56, Michal Prívozník wrote: On 5/15/23 19:07, lejeczek wrote: Hi guys. I have a domain definition with this: ...             at the bottom of xml. 'virsh' creates domain a okey but in VM I do not see ignition happened - it's fedora coreos - and when I dumpxml runni

Re: ignored ?

2023-05-16 Thread Erik Huelsmann
> > No need for using as this is well configurable via > > domain XML (for ~3 years): > > > > https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#smbios-system-information > > > > > >example value > > > > > > > > Michal > > > this gets more neat every minute one learns more of libvirt. > So, I'd take

Re: Invalid value '-1' for 'cpu.max': Invalid argument - a result of?

2023-05-16 Thread Michal Prívozník
On 5/15/23 15:35, lejeczek wrote: > > > On 15/05/2023 12:06, Michal Prívozník wrote: >> On 5/14/23 07:35, lejeczek wrote: >>> Hi guys. >>> >>> In hope that an expert read this - what is, can be, the below a >>> result of? >>> >>> 12284 still running (86040) >>> Invalid value '-1' for 'cpu.max': I

Re: Invalid value '-1' for 'cpu.max': Invalid argument - a result of?

2023-05-16 Thread lejeczek
On 16/05/2023 14:14, Michal Prívozník wrote: On 5/15/23 15:35, lejeczek wrote: On 15/05/2023 12:06, Michal Prívozník wrote: On 5/14/23 07:35, lejeczek wrote: Hi guys. In hope that an expert read this - what is, can be, the below a result of? 12284 still running (86040) Invalid value '-1'