- Am 6. Okt 2020 um 22:52 schrieb Jim Fehlig jfeh...@suse.com:
> On 10/6/20 7:55 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have a domain (SLES 10 SP4) running with KVM.
>
> Wow, that's old! I'm surprised time keeping is your only problem :-).
It is indeed the only problem.
>
>> Time is ve
On 10/7/20 5:52 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
- Am 6. Okt 2020 um 22:52 schrieb Jim Fehlig jfeh...@suse.com:
On 10/6/20 7:55 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
Hi,
i have a domain (SLES 10 SP4) running with KVM.
Wow, that's old! I'm surprised time keeping is your only problem :-).
It is indeed the
Hi,
Is it possible that "virsh destroy" does not stop a domain ?
I'm asking because i have some domains running in a two-node HA-Cluster
(pacemaker).
And sometimes one node get fenced (killed) because it couldn't stop a domain.
That's very ugly.
This is also the reason why i asked before what "v
Bernd, another option would be a mismatch between the message that "virsh
destroy" issues and the message that force_stop() in the pacemaker agent
expects to receive. Pacemaker is trying to determine the success or
failure of the destroy based on the concatenation of the text of the exit
code and
I am having a few hosts running just libvirt, among which I can do live
migration. Is there some way or does someone have a script to balance
guests evenly across these hosts? Based on memory usage eg.
Hello there,
I'm trying to play with musl and libvirt to see if I'm able to build a
libvirt client binary without dynamic lib dependencies. I have two
questions:
1) to your knowledge, is this exercise futile?
2) Do you know if there is a way to *only* compile the library bits?
I want to reduce
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 10:21 PM Alex Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:05:05 -0400
> Marc Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using QEMU/KVM on RHEL (CentOS) 7.8.2003:
> > # cat /etc/redhat-release
> > CentOS Linux release 7.8.2003
> >
> > I'm passing an NVMe drive into a Linux KVM virtu
