On 15.04.2015 05:55, Jatin Davey wrote:
>> Is there any particular reason why you are using RHEL 5? The current
>> version is RHEL 7 which contains much more up-to-date versions of
>> kernel, qemu and other virtualization tools.
>>
>> Regards,
>>Dennis
>>
>>
>> _
Is there any particular reason why you are using RHEL 5? The current
version is RHEL 7 which contains much more up-to-date versions of
kernel, qemu and other virtualization tools.
Regards,
Dennis
___
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@redhat.
On 4/15/2015 2:21 AM, Nikki VonHollen wrote:
Hi Jatin,
The RedHat documentation on this is extremely helpful. It's so helpful
that I use it as a reference on completely different distributions.
VMWare does a pretty good job of guiding you and giving you defaults
that are sensible. With Libvi
On 14.04.2015 15:16, Jatin Davey wrote:
> On 4/14/2015 6:32 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> On 14/04/15 13:33, Jatin Davey wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Dominique & Daniel.
>>>
>>> Looks like i need to upgrade my VMs kernel to make it aware of virtio.
>>>
>>> Found this information from this link:
>>>
>>> http://w
orspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Jatin Davey [mailto:jasho...@cisco.com ]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2015 13:39
> Aan: Daniel P. Berrange
> CC: Dominique Ramaekers; libvirt-users@redhat.com
> Onderwerp: Re: [libvirt-users] VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
>
> On 4/14/20
2015 13:39
Aan: Daniel P. Berrange
CC: Dominique Ramaekers;libvirt-users@redhat.com
Onderwerp: Re: [libvirt-users] VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
On 4/14/2015 4:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 04:53:52PM +0530, Jatin Davey wrote:
On 4/14/2015 4:42 PM, Dominique R
On 14/04/15 14:16, Jatin Davey wrote:
My VM is using the kernel 2.6.18-164.el5
[root@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 2009 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Should this be fine ?
Well it won't have virtio-scsi I'm sure, but what does "modinfo
On 4/14/2015 6:51 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/04/15 14:16, Jatin Davey wrote:
My VM is using the kernel 2.6.18-164.el5
[root@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 2009 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Should this be fine ?
Well it won't have virti
On 4/14/2015 6:32 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/04/15 13:33, Jatin Davey wrote:
Thanks Dominique & Daniel.
Looks like i need to upgrade my VMs kernel to make it aware of virtio.
Found this information from this link:
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Virtio#Disk_.28block.29_device_driver
I tried w
On 14/04/15 13:33, Jatin Davey wrote:
Thanks Dominique & Daniel.
Looks like i need to upgrade my VMs kernel to make it aware of virtio.
Found this information from this link:
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Virtio#Disk_.28block.29_device_driver
I tried without upgrading the Kernel and as soon a
isco.com]
>> Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2015 13:39
>> Aan: Daniel P. Berrange
>> CC: Dominique Ramaekers; libvirt-users@redhat.com
>> Onderwerp: Re: [libvirt-users] VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
>>
>> On 4/14/2015 4:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wro
.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2015 13:39
Aan: Daniel P. Berrange
CC: Dominique Ramaekers; libvirt-users@redhat.com
Onderwerp: Re: [libvirt-users] VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
On 4/14/2015 4:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 04:53:52PM +0530, Jatin Davey wrote:
Please read: https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jatin Davey [mailto:jasho...@cisco.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2015 13:39
Aan: Daniel P. Berrange
CC: Dominique Ramaekers; libvirt-users@redhat.com
Onderwerp: Re: [libvirt-users] VM Performance using
On 4/14/2015 4:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 04:53:52PM +0530, Jatin Davey wrote:
On 4/14/2015 4:42 PM, Dominique Ramaekers wrote:
About Spice: I think it’s good practice to use spice because it improves
the performance of the VM in general by improving screen perform
...@cisco.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2015 13:24
Aan: Dominique Ramaekers;
libvirt-users@redhat.com<mailto:libvirt-users@redhat.com>
Onderwerp: Re: [libvirt-users] VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
On 4/14/2015 4:42 PM, Dominique Ramaekers wrote:
About Spice: I think it’s good pract
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 04:53:52PM +0530, Jatin Davey wrote:
> On 4/14/2015 4:42 PM, Dominique Ramaekers wrote:
> >
> >About Spice: I think it’s good practice to use spice because it improves
> >the performance of the VM in general by improving screen performance. If
> >your VM is constantly displa
On 4/14/2015 4:42 PM, Dominique Ramaekers wrote:
About Spice: I think it’s good practice to use spice because it
improves the performance of the VM in general by improving screen
performance. If your VM is constantly displaying output, you’ll
probably will notice a difference.
[Jatin] Ok, T
your XML. If
you post your XML, we can take a look…
Van: Jatin Davey [mailto:jasho...@cisco.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2015 12:44
Aan: Dominique Ramaekers; libvirt-users@redhat.com
Onderwerp: Re: [libvirt-users] VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
On 4/14/2015 4:02 PM, Dominique
On 4/14/2015 4:02 PM, Dominique Ramaekers wrote:
Dear Jatin,
Maybe it’s a good idea first to implement Spice:
function='0x0'/>
Spice should be installed on the host.
[Jatin] How will using Spice help in improving better response time from
a web application that i am using ins
Dear Jatin,
Maybe it’s a good idea first to implement Spice:
Spice should be installed on the host.
Do you use vi
On 4/14/2015 3:52 PM, Jatin Davey wrote:
Hi All
We are currently testing our product using KVM as the hypervisor. We
are not using KVM as a bare-metal hypervisor. We use it on top of a
RHEL installation. So basically RHEL acts as our host and using KVM we
deploy guests on this system.
We ha
21 matches
Mail list logo
