On 07/25/2016 02:49 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander :
"Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where
should the vnet be connected?
The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an
interface of type "ethe
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 08:49:23AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander :
"Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where
should the vnet be connected?
The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an
interf
❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander :
>>> "Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where
>>> should the vnet be connected?
>>
>>The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an
>>interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get th
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:58:53AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 25 juillet 2016 06:06 CEST, Martin Kletzander :
╭─┤ http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├─
│Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is
│to be connected to the physical LAN.Si
❦ 25 juillet 2016 06:06 CEST, Martin Kletzander :
>>╭─┤ http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├─
>>│Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is
>>│to be connected to the physical LAN.Since 0.3.0. The mode attribute
>>│determines the method of fo
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:18:19PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
Hey!
Another question. The documentation about networks say:
╭─┤ http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├─
│Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is
│to be connected to the physi
