Re: [libvirt-users] the naming convention libvirt names a block based storage volume

2011-08-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:02:41AM -0400, Dave Allan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:20:10AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 03:28:50PM -0700, Yih-Herng Chuang wrote: > > > > > > > > > Seems like different libvirt versions generate a storage volume name in > > > d

Re: [libvirt-users] the naming convention libvirt names a block based storage volume

2011-08-10 Thread Dave Allan
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:20:10AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 03:28:50PM -0700, Yih-Herng Chuang wrote: > > > > > > Seems like different libvirt versions generate a storage volume name in > > different format. We would like to learn how libvirt names a storage > >

Re: [libvirt-users] the naming convention libvirt names a block based storage volume

2011-08-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 03:28:50PM -0700, Yih-Herng Chuang wrote: > > > Seems like different libvirt versions generate a storage volume name in > different format. We would like to learn how libvirt names a storage > volume under a block based storage pool. So that we may properly extract > the

[libvirt-users] the naming convention libvirt names a block based storage volume

2011-08-09 Thread Yih-Herng Chuang
Seems like different libvirt versions generate a storage volume name in different format. We would like to learn how libvirt names a storage volume under a block based storage pool. So that we may properly extract the LUN identifier out of the volume name for now and in the future. On host A l