On 07/06/2014 01:23 PM, jayunit...@gmail.com wrote:
[please don't top-post on technical lists]
> Centos is not going to generally have the cutting edge stuff. For that why
> not try fedora which will generally package with the newest libraries from
> various packages, including qemu .
>
> I th
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Privoznik"
> To: "kerwin" , libvirt-users@redhat.com
> Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 8:17:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] qemu-kvm version for CentOS
>
> On 06.07.2014 16:01, kerwin wrote:
> > WHY Cent
On 06.07.2014 16:01, kerwin wrote:
WHY CentOS still using qemu-kvm 0.12?
What I am need is high version of qemu-kvm for CentOS, but seems like
they do not officially provide newest qemu, only qemu 0.12 source code
with 3522 patched rpm package.
With distros it's always a question of stability
Centos is not going to generally have the cutting edge stuff. For that why not
try fedora which will generally package with the newest libraries from various
packages, including qemu .
I think the current fedora repos have qemu 2.1
> On Jul 6, 2014, at 10:01 AM, kerwin wrote:
>
> WHY CentOS s
WHY CentOS still using qemu-kvm 0.12?
What I am need is high version of qemu-kvm for CentOS, but seems like they do
not officially provide newest qemu, only qemu 0.12 source code with 3522
patched rpm package.
Is there any reasonable to keep low version for qemu-kvm ? or what should I do
if I
