Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-21 Thread Francesco Romani
(CC devel list - better late than never) On 03/16/2017 04:23 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:52:47 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:50:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: On Th

Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-17 Thread Francesco Romani
(sorry for the wrong list, I was unsure and I choose the wrong one :\) On 03/16/2017 03:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: >> For techincal discussions on design it's better to post to the >> development list. >> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 201

Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:52:47 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:50:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:42:30 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46

Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-16 Thread Peter Krempa
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:52:47 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:50:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:42:30 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 16:41

Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:50:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:42:30 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 16:41:28 +0100, Francesco Romani wrote: > > [...] > > > > In general I don

Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-16 Thread Peter Krempa
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 14:42:30 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 16:41:28 +0100, Francesco Romani wrote: [...] > > In general I don't have a problem with this and if it would make the > > life of mgmt tools

Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > For techincal discussions on design it's better to post to the > development list. > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 16:41:28 +0100, Francesco Romani wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > > > > > Currently libvirt supports metadata in the dom

Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-16 Thread Peter Krempa
For techincal discussions on design it's better to post to the development list. On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 16:41:28 +0100, Francesco Romani wrote: > Hi, Hi, > > > Currently libvirt supports metadata in the domain XML. This is very > convenient for data related to the VM, but it is a little awkw

Re: [libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-03-08 Thread Francesco Romani
Ping? Would it be feasible? Or is the very basic idea unfit? bests, On 02/27/2017 04:41 PM, Francesco Romani wrote: > Hi, > > > Currently libvirt supports metadata in the domain XML. This is very > convenient for data related to the VM, but it is a little awkward for > devices. Let's pretend

[libvirt-users] [RFC] per-device metadata

2017-02-27 Thread Francesco Romani
Hi, Currently libvirt supports metadata in the domain XML. This is very convenient for data related to the VM, but it is a little awkward for devices. Let's pretend I want to have extradata (say, a specific port for a virtual switch) related to a device (say, a NIC). Nowadays I can store that dat