why not using collectd with the libvirt plugin on your host. It will
colect the info, and then you just have to display with rrdtool
On , journey journey wrote:
Hi All
Is there a tool to monitor qemu-kvm guest vm memory usage ( free in
guest vm)?
Nowadays, I have already researched some metho
, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 10:37 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 08.08.2016 10:23, Patrick PICHON wrote:
>
> hello Michal,
>
> That was my worries as well, and I think that your advice is probably
> the right one. Or even, I'm might request an enhanc
Just found virt-df ( libguestfs package) which seems doing what I need.
Just need to integrate the result in an collectd/rrd format
On , Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 08.08.2016 09:33, Patrick PICHON wrote:
Hello,
All my VMs are using LVs created on the host side.
I'm using collec
hello Michal,
That was my worries as well, and I think that your advice is probably
the right one. Or even, I'm might request an enhancement to the collect
libvirt plugin to report also FS information.
Kind regards
patrick
On , Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 08.08.2016 09:33, Patrick P
Hello,
All my VMs are using LVs created on the host side.
I'm using collectd to monitor some of the ressources of my host as well
as the libvirt pluging to monitor my VMs.
Collectd has an interesting plugin ( df ) which can monitor the
filesystem usage.
I would like to use it to monitor t
Have a look if vhost_net is loaded on the guest and if not load it with
modeprobe vhost_net
Last when doing your lab perf test are you sure that you are not penalised by
disk io either in input or outputs
Envoyé de mon iPhone
> Le 29 févr. 2016 à 17:13, Dominique Ramaekers
> a écrit :
>
>
Hello,
I’m trying to set a default gateway on an isolated lan (because one of my VM
get access to an other lan).
I’m trying to use the option but this doesn’t affect the default route
on my VMs.
Here is the network xml
prd-private-lan
22
Hello,
I would like to set a specify default gateway for my VMs. However I’m not
succeeding
Here after is the isolated lan, where I added the statement
When looking on the VM (guest) the route is not
driver (with driver name=qemu), but in that case, no packets are
dropped
So is that a different behaviour of the bvirtio-net when it is in Kernel mode
and when it is in User space ?
Patrick
> On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:51, Troels Arvin wrote:
>
> pichon wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:51, Troels Arvin wrote:
>
> pichon wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> pichon wrote:
>> On each of my guests VM, I see constantly a RX dropped number increasing
>> , Even if the VM does nothing !
>
> I'm seeing the same phenomenon on one of our
Hello,
For me it makes sense that the dropped stop when you are using tcpdump as you
are indeed takes those packets !
For me the main question, is why such traffic is going to the VM ?
Kind regards
Patrick
> On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:51, Troels Arvin wrote:
>
> pichon wrote:
&
Last, if in the VM I add “driver name = ‘emu’, after boot I have few dropped
packets, but then it doesn’t increase anymore !
>
>
>
>
>
>
> function='0x0'/>
>
> On 23 Jan 2016, at 10:58, pichon wrote:
>
>
Hello,
I have first a question (and then may be a problem), that I have difficulties
to understand and eventually to investigate.
On each of my guests VM, I see constantly a RX dropped number increasing , Even
if the VM does nothing !
ifconfig
eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500
inet 192.168.10
13 matches
Mail list logo
