On 24 April 2015 at 20:47, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 04/24/2015 02:02 PM, mimic...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Centos 6.5 both packages cannot be identified. any idea?
> >
> >
>
> Yes. CentS 6 uses libvirt-0.10.2 + a ton of backported patches. The
> splitting of l
respond to points from several messages at once (and also makes it easier
> to understand the discussion by reading just one of those messages).
>
> On 04/24/2015 11:08 AM, mimic...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> HI Michal
>
>
> Thank you for explaining. I have this situation in a numb
oarch
libvirt-0.10.2-46.el6_6.3.x86_64
libvirt-cim-0.6.1-12.el6.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.10.2-46.el6_6.3.x86_64
libvirt-devel-0.10.2-46.el6_6.3.x86_64
Mimi
On 24 April 2015 at 16:08, mimic...@gmail.com wrote:
> HI Michal
>
>
> Thank you for explaining. I have this situation in a number
IPs to the
VMs.
I'll look to remove both libivirt-daemon-driver-network,
libvirt-daemon-driver-network
and dnsmasq.
Any further thought from your side?
On 24 April 2015 at 13:12, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 24.04.2015 12:45, mimic...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I am running KVM virtu
I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged
network mode, however I still have the default virtual network
bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand
is whether or not dnsmasq and the virtual network (*virbr0, Vnet0 and Vnet1*)
still pla
