Hi Michal,
Ok. Fine.
Will do the same.
Regards,
Sagar
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Michal Privoznik
wrote:
> On 24.11.2014 13:51, Sagar Shedge wrote:
>
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> Please can you try this scenario once you get free time. Currently
,
Sagar
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Michal Privoznik
wrote:
> On 12.11.2014 14:55, Sagar Shedge wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>>
>> I have two virtual machines VM1 and VM2. Then I have added eth0 of my
>> VM to 'default' network.
>>
>> Use c
Hi ,
If you have any idea then please respond.
Regards,
Sagar
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sagar Shedge
Date: Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:25 PM
Subject: Put virbr0 in promiscusous
To: libvirt-users@redhat.com
Hi ,
I have two virtual machines VM1 and VM2. Then I have added eth0
Hi Laine,
Ok. Got the point that how it will affect my network and NATed
functionality.
Thanks a lot for this description.
Regards,
Sagar
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 08:21 AM, Sagar Shedge wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got this NOTE on
Hi ,
I have two virtual machines VM1 and VM2. Then I have added eth0 of my VM
to 'default' network.
Use case :-
I want to monitor all traffic on virbr0('default' network).
Steps followed :-
1. Add VM1 eth0 to virbr0
2. Add VM2 eth1 to virbr0
3. brctl setageing ovsbr0 0 ..(To put bridge in prom
Hi,
I got this NOTE on most of the link. But I am not getting reason for this.
Why someone should not add physical NIC to virbr0. I tried to add my eth1
to virbr0 and it get added.
So whether it affects to some functionality of NAT network?
--
Sagar Dilip Shedge,
Pune.
With Regards.
___
