On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 23:54 +0200, Jérôme wrote:
> Le Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:32:45 +0800,
> Bill Kenworthy a écrit :
>
> > Look into the "panic" option to ntpd - once the gap gets to big
> > (such
> > as when the VM is suspended for a few hours) it goes into freewheel
> > and doesn't sync - its in t
I filed a bug about this at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252780
Dropping back to libvirt-1.2.2 fixed it for me, but there was no answer to the
bug report.
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
chenhongz...@zhicloud.com wrote
>_
On 11/08/2015 08:28, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> Just as an addendum, the said RPMs should be available in standard
> Fedora repositories, too. Not to mention, one could file issues in the
> upstream libvirt bug tracker.
I just filed a bug against libvirt 1.2.18 in bugzilla, but for the
future, fo
On 11/08/2015 09:22, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:25:30AM +0100, Mark Clarkson wrote:
On 11/08/2015 07:31, Martin Kletzander wrote:
The fact that it's deprecated in some distributions doesn't mean
we're dropping it.
So, just to be clear, there are no pl
On 11/08/2015 09:21, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> In addition we have a
> GSoC project developing the ability to let you run Docker containers
> using libvirt-lxc and also libvirt-kvm !
Er. Wow! Very exciting.
___
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users
On 11/08/2015 07:31, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> The fact that it's deprecated in some distributions doesn't mean
> we're dropping it.
So, just to be clear, there are no plans to drop the lxc driver from
libvirt?
___
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-u
t-lxc be dropped from libvirt?
Will there be an alternative for a similar container based use-case (as
in requiring a full machine) on RedHat?
Best Regards
Mark Clarkson
___
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
