Re: [libvirt-users] [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience

Hi, > >>  2. Currently with gvt solution there few mdev devices each with fixed > >>  resolution. User should be able to configure own resolutions for > >>  devices at host without additional manipulations in guest. Ideally, > >>  resolution should be dynamic and change appropriately on resize o

Re: [libvirt-users] [iGVT-g] GVT-g - suboptimal user experience

So it looks like this solution is currently not very user friendly. Perhaps Intel could get Red Hat help to make first-class support of gvt feature in virt-manager? 09.05.2019, 10:28, "Gerd Hoffmann" : >   Hi, > >>  1. Its about local display / dmabuf feature. Currently user needs to >>  use vir

Re: [libvirt-users] virtio-user intarfece

Hello all (my prev msg was broken) i have multiple workload containers connected to my DPDK-app. I have another special container - which all packets are mirrored to it. Is it possible for zero-copy reason - that all virtio interfaces shared memory between my DPDK-app and workload containers - can

[libvirt-users] virtio-user intarfece

Hello all i have multiple workload containers connected to my DPDK-app. I have another special container - which all packets are mirrored to it. Is it possible for zero-copy reason - that all virtio interfaces shared memory between my DPDK-app and workload containers - can be accessed by this spec