Re: [libvirt-users] compile error libvirt-python 4.5.0 - error: unknown type name ?virNWFilterBindingPtr?

2018-07-10 Thread Holger Schranz
Hi Daniel, thanks a lot. Best regards Holger Am 09.07.2018 um 10:28 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 09:34:27PM +0200, Holger Schranz wrote: Hello, I have tried to upgrade libvirt / libvort-python from 4.4.0 to 4.5.0 [snip] -I/usr/include/python2.7 -c libvirt-override.

Re: [libvirt-users] dmesg shows Intel Virt., lsmod shows kvm_intel; "Host does not [have] virt. options"

2018-07-10 Thread Quincy Wofford
Thank you. Yes, the immediate problem was that I was missing the qemu-kvm dependency. On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:09 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 07:47:49AM -0600, Quincy Wofford wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've tried over at IRC and it appears the solution to this problem

Re: [libvirt-users] dmesg shows Intel Virt., lsmod shows kvm_intel; "Host does not [have] virt. options"

2018-07-10 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 07:47:49AM -0600, Quincy Wofford wrote: > Hello, > > I've tried over at IRC and it appears the solution to this problem may not > be obvious. > > I'm working with a Centos7 box on HP ProLiant 380p hardware. The BIOS is a > bit outdated, but both Intel Virtualization Option

[libvirt-users] dmesg shows Intel Virt., lsmod shows kvm_intel; "Host does not [have] virt. options"

2018-07-10 Thread Quincy Wofford
Hello, I've tried over at IRC and it appears the solution to this problem may not be obvious. I'm working with a Centos7 box on HP ProLiant 380p hardware. The BIOS is a bit outdated, but both Intel Virtualization Options and VT-d are present and enabled in the firmware. Some relevant command out

Re: [libvirt-users] USB network adapter nat support

2018-07-10 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 07/10/2018 07:12 AM, Robert Searle wrote: > Hi > > I read wireless nat networks are not supported. What about USB network > adapters? Can I setup a nat network on a USB network adapter? > I'm not sure what do you mean by "wireless nat network". Isn't the point of NAT that it is independent