On 24 April 2015 at 20:47, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 04/24/2015 02:02 PM, mimic...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Centos 6.5 both packages cannot be identified. any idea?
> >
> >
>
> Yes. CentS 6 uses libvirt-0.10.2 + a ton of backported patches. The
> splitting of libvirt into a bunch of smaller subpacka
On 04/24/2015 02:02 PM, mimic...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Centos 6.5 both packages cannot be identified. any idea?
>
>
Yes. CentS 6 uses libvirt-0.10.2 + a ton of backported patches. The
splitting of libvirt into a bunch of smaller subpackages so that admins
could more easily tailor what was installe
=
CALL FOR PAPERS
10th Workshop on Virtualization in High-Performance Cloud Computing (VHPC
'15)
held in conjunction with Euro-Par 2015, August 24-28, Vienna, Austria
(Springer LNCS)
===
On 24 April 2015 at 18:00, Laine Stump wrote:
> (in before Eric for this :-) Please don't top-post in responses on this
> list (or most other technical lists). Posting your responses in the context
> of the previous message makes it much easier for followups that want to
> respond to points from
On Centos 6.5 both packages cannot be identified. any idea?
sudo yum search libivirt-daemon-driver-network
libvirt-daemon-config-network
[sudo] password for bigfoot:
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: www.mirrorservice.o
(in before Eric for this :-) Please don't top-post in responses on this
list (or most other technical lists). Posting your responses in the
context of the previous message makes it much easier for followups that
want to respond to points from several messages at once (and also makes
it easier to un
HI Michal
Thank you for explaining. I have this situation in a number of production
servers where we would always use static IPs for the host and VMs. In such
case we have no requirement for NATed network in the future. And we we
ever do, we can rely on a DHCP server within the LAN to provide IP
On 24.04.2015 12:45, mimic...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged
> network mode, however I still have the default virtual network
> bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand
> is whether or not dnsmasq and th
I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged
network mode, however I still have the default virtual network
bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand
is whether or not dnsmasq and the virtual network (*virbr0, Vnet0 and Vnet1*)
still pla
