On 02/10/2014 06:46 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've run into a problem with libvirt 1.1.2 and are looking for some comments
> on whether this is a bug or design intent.
>
> We're trying to use migrateToURI() but we're using a few things (numatune,
> vcpu mask, etc.) that may need adjustm
I know I would still have to provide the Mon addresses and Cephx user to go
with the secret UUID, that's fine. The primary goal is so I can just see if
I can open a RADOS connection to the cluster before I try a virsh
attach-device.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Scott Sullivan <
scottgregorysu
As the subject suggests, I am wondering if its possible to verify if the
currently defined libvirt secret provides valid authentication via Cephx to
a Ceph cluster?
I ask because ideally I would like to verify that the given cephx
credentials in my libvirt secret are valid before I even attempt th
Just to complete my previous post, tests are successful with Intel card
82599EB 10-Gigabit SFP+. As expected, there's an internal switch for
VF/VF or VF/PF communications.
I don't know yet what's wrong with SR-IOV on Broadcom cards.
--
Université de Nantes - Direction des Systèmes d'Informatio
- Mail original -
> De: "Jiri Denemark"
> À: "Mohamed Amine Larabi"
> Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com
> Envoyé: Mardi 11 Février 2014 11:02:06
> Objet: Re: [libvirt-users] libvirt 1.2.1 / lxc : default virtual network not
> defined after installing/starting
> Libvirt
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 20
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 15:13:05 +0100, Mohamed Amine Larabi wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I am using Libvirt 1.2.1 on Fedora 20.
>
> So, Libvirt is well installed and started but the weird thing is that
> the 'default' virtual network is not automatically defined and
> started, knowing that I can def
