Re: [libvirt-users] Looks like blockpull does not accept a subset of the entire chain of backing files

Hello Eric, Absolutely enlightening! Thanks a lot :) Richard Gomes http://rgomes.info http://www.linkedin.com/in/rgomes mobile: +44(77)9955-6813 inum : +883(5100)0800-9804 sip:rgo...@ippi.fr On 29/01/14 16:46, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/29/2014 07:51 AM, Richard Gomes wrote

Re: [libvirt-users] Looks like blockpull does not accept a subset of the entire chain of backing files

On 01/29/2014 07:51 AM, Richard Gomes wrote: > Hello > > If I'm not terribly mistaken, looks like libvirt 1.2.1 does not provide > ability of merging only a subset of the entire chain of backing files. Correct - qemu doesn't provide full functionality for merging in all directions. And even thou

[libvirt-users] Looks like blockpull does not accept a subset of the entire chain of backing files

Hello If I'm not terribly mistaken, looks like libvirt 1.2.1 does not provide ability of merging only a subset of the entire chain of backing files. So, if I have a chain like this: root <- a <-b <- c <- d <- active ... and I'd like to obtain a chain like this:

Re: [libvirt-users] libvirt-sandbox question.

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:59:30AM -0500, Christopher Stone wrote: > I hope this question isn't considered too off topic for this list, I am > trying to reach the libvirt-sandbox developers, but I could not find a > libvirt-sandbox specific mailing list, and it seemed to me that > libvirt-sandbox w

[libvirt-users] libvirt-sandbox question.

I hope this question isn't considered too off topic for this list, I am trying to reach the libvirt-sandbox developers, but I could not find a libvirt-sandbox specific mailing list, and it seemed to me that libvirt-sandbox was a part of libvirt itself. I am trying to port libvirt-sandbox to run on

Re: [libvirt-users] dropping capabilities in lxc containers

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:33:23PM +0100, Thierry Parmentelat wrote: > Thanks for the feedback > I take it from your answer that there is no current plan in the > direction of adding this as a feature, right ? I'm not aware of anyone currently working on this feature. > In this case, how would yo

Re: [libvirt-users] dropping capabilities in lxc containers

Thanks for the feedback I take it from your answer that there is no current plan in the direction of adding this as a feature, right ? In this case, how would you welcome pull requests if we managed to add this on our side ? Many thanks — Thierry On 29 Jan 2014, at 14:27, Daniel P. Berrange w

Re: [libvirt-users] dropping capabilities in lxc containers

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:43:25AM +0100, Thierry Parmentelat wrote: > Hi there > > I’m not quite proficient with libvirt yet, and have been using it > so far primarily to manage lxc containers > I was hoping to find a means to configure the set of capabilities > that guests should drop, but came

[libvirt-users] dropping capabilities in lxc containers

Hi there I’m not quite proficient with libvirt yet, and have been using it so far primarily to manage lxc containers I was hoping to find a means to configure the set of capabilities that guests should drop, but came across a few web pages suggesting these were set in stone in the code is this

Re: [libvirt-users] Libvirt-LXC + systemd + user namespace

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Piotr Bartosiewicz wrote: > > On 28.01.2014 12:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Jan Olszak wrote: > >>Hi there! > >> > >>I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the > >>config: > >> > >>

Re: [libvirt-users] Libvirt-LXC + systemd + user namespace

On 28.01.2014 12:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Jan Olszak wrote: Hi there! I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the config: As you can see the root in container is mapped to the root