On 22/12/2010, at 3:23 AM, Scott Baker wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 03:15 AM, Anthony Davis wrote:
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> I can offer some free time:)
>
> I'd be willing to contribute to a wiki if we had the docs in a wiki.
Yeah I know what you mean. Wiki's are *so* much easier to work with and
revise,
On 22/12/2010, at 4:01 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 22/12/2010, at 2:31 AM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
>> I am interested, but not sure if/how I can contribute.
>
> All good. Showing that you're interested is the right first step. :)
>
> There are quite a few really important things that need to be
>
On 22/12/2010, at 2:31 AM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> I am interested, but not sure if/how I can contribute.
All good. Showing that you're interested is the right first step. :)
There are quite a few really important things that need to be
improved with the libvirt documentation, so it more comes d
On 12/21/2010 03:15 AM, Anthony Davis wrote:
Hi Justin,
I can offer some free time:)
I'd be willing to contribute to a wiki if we had the docs in a wiki.
--
Scott Baker - Canby Telcom
System Administrator - RHCE - 503.266.8253
___
libvirt-users mai
On 21/12/2010, at 10:15 PM, Anthony Davis wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> I can offer some free time :)
Awesome Anthony, very welcome. :)
There's a pretty broad spectrum of things we need to get improved. :)
>From stuff that doesn't take any real virtualisation knowledge:
+ The new Virsh Command Ref
I am interested, but not sure if/how I can contribute.
___
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
Hi Justin,
I can offer some free time :)
Anthony Davis.
On 21 Dec 2010, at 10:53, Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There's a lot of documentation for libvirt that needs improving, so wondering
> if anyone would be interested in forming a libvirt "docs" team to help make
> that happen?
>
>
Hi all,
There's a lot of documentation for libvirt that needs improving, so wondering
if anyone would be interested in forming a libvirt "docs" team to help make
that happen?
While some of the documentation needs people familiar with specific pieces
of libvirt, there's also a lot that doesn't, an
Hi Tony,
> Well iv installed the default RPMS via Centos (5.5)
Hmm, than you should probably ask CentOS guys for help. They apparently left
RHEL's libvirt but made their own qemu package. Since libvirt 0.6.3 wasn't
very smart, it had to be modified to support machine types provided by RHEL's
qemu
