On Thu, 18 May 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Behdad,
>
> * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:39:30AM CEST:
> > On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:25:41AM CEST:
> > > >
>
replying after two years... I know. Hope you still remember
this issue and the patch is not too stale by now...
> * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:59:38PM CET:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Behdad Esfahbod wrote on We
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 23:38 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
>
>
> I think that all above is out of libtool scope.
> It's is exceptional project specific (lets skip cross-compilation
> environment) and is subject of project regression test suite.
> The project is responsible to set appropriate test e
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 16:40 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> An unfortunate thing is that not all software is configured the same.
> For example, my own software supports independent configuration for
> the location of different types of files. A single top "prefix"
> environment variable wou
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 00:45 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 23:38 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
> >>
> >> I think that all above is out of libtool scope.
> >> It's is exceptional project specific (lets skip cr
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 02:32 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > [SNIP]
> >> But if user run directly an application installed in non-default
> >> location the user is responsible to set environment.
> >
> > I'm not talking about a
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:53 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
>
> In some cases application depend from other services.
> In this case a specific to project wrapper script has to run
> services,
> to check if service is run, to run project application and when
> application finish to stop service. The
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:32 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
>
>
> About "no way to fix this problem with autotools". Why ?
> As example libxml can run binaries from build dir. In one of the
> tests
> is created specific xml catalog and application is run with this
> catalog
> instead with system.
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 14:36 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> I assume that it works. Of course it does not work with some
> IDE-based debuggers. It can be made to work with programs like 'ddd'
> and 'emacs' which talk to a traditional debugger over a pseudo-tty or
> pipe.
autotool-aware IDE
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 22:27 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
> I perfectly know that user
> cannot go in build-dir and just to run secure shell daemon/client.
And if you are happy with that, good for you. In GNOME though, we want
our users to be able to run uninstalled programs. If this feature is
n
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 23:16 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
> For my users, from make and some wrapper script, I setup environment,
> run some servers (as example openldap with preloaded data) run
> un-installed programs so my users see that things work before to
> install.
Ok, then this feature wi
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 16:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 22:27 +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
> >> I perfectly know that user
> >> cannot go in build-dir and just to run secure shell daemon/client.
> >
> > A
12 matches
Mail list logo
