On 2013-11-08 20:07, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 11/8/2013 1:49 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> Isn't it because libtool wants to control the order of the linking and
>> assure that all dependencies (including static) are tracked/known and
>> applied at the correct times? It wants to assure that stat
Hi!
I noticed this while looking at the -nostdlib stuff. Will push
in a couple of days unless there are valid objections.
Cheers,
Peter
>From 7efe9b28d977fccded55843c8bee3458835d0435 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:00:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] libtool: update
On 2013-11-11 10:37, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Will push in a couple of days unless there are valid objections.
Forget it. I am a moron. It would be more valid to simply remove
the GXX=no assignment, but I can't classify that as a bug. Sorry
for wasting your bandwidth.
Cheers,
Peter
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Peter Rosin wrote:
Quite a lot of effort went into making this work the way it currently does.
I realize that, but if it really works or not is a different question :-)
Yes, of course. It is obviously primarily "working" as demonstrated by
the massive amount of software
