Re: [PATCH] libtool: LT_PATH_NM: default to ${ac_tool_prefix}nm

2013-04-28 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-27 22:38, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 27 April 2013 13:53:28 Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2013-04-27 07:58, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> The current code tries to locate a compatible nm tool. It starts with >>> a prefixed nm tool (great!) and includes a plain nm too (that's fine). >>>

Re: [PATCH] libtool: LT_PATH_NM: default to ${ac_tool_prefix}nm

2013-04-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 28 April 2013 03:21:15 Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-27 22:38, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 27 April 2013 13:53:28 Peter Rosin wrote: > >> On 2013-04-27 07:58, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> The current code tries to locate a compatible nm tool. It starts with > >>> a prefixed nm

Re: [PATCH] libtool: LT_PATH_NM: default to ${ac_tool_prefix}nm

2013-04-28 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-29 04:45, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 28 April 2013 03:21:15 Peter Rosin wrote: >> And on re-reading, my IFS changes are not very constructive. I removed >> those. I will push the attached in a couple of days, if there are no >> objections. > > i actually thought your IFS changes