Re: git-version-gen w/o git

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-12-24 03:05, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 11/29/2012 11:12 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> This seems to be stalled because of a misconception. Can I please get >> a second opinion? Please? > > I'm afraid I don't understand the problem well enough to offer > an opinion -- maybe it's because I don't u

Re: git-version-gen w/o git

2012-12-27 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/27/2012 03:41 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: If it helps I can regenerate with your redirection fix, but I assume whoever commits it can fix that part easily enough. Just let me know. How about if you do that, and we give Eric and/or others a week or two to comment, and if there's no objection t

Re: git-version-gen w/o git

2012-12-27 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Peter Rosin wrote: Libtool remains regressed and a PITA to work with for me until this is fixed. I'm a bit frustrated since the changes are tiny and non-intrusive, at least in my opinion. I also find the extra dependencies to be frustrating. In my case, I check out and d