Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort)

2010-12-16 Thread Christian Rössel
Hi Ralf, Am 12/15/2010 9:21 PM, schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: > * Christian Rössel wrote on Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:38:13PM CET: >> Am 12/10/2010 6:55 PM, schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: >>> Alternatively, the untested patch below should help as well. Can you >>> try it out? >> >> Unfortunately the patch did

Re: Enhanced OS/2 port

2010-12-16 Thread KO Myung-Hun
Hi/2. Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ adding libtool-patches@; followups can remove libtool@ ] > > * KO Myung-Hun wrote on Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:20:32AM CET: >> I've enhanced and fixed libtool 2.4 for OS/2. > > Thanks again for working on this. > > Generally, we prefer one patch per logical change

Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort)

2010-12-16 Thread Christian Rössel
Hi Ralf, Am 12/10/2010 6:55 PM, schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: > Hello Christian, > > * Christian Rössel wrote on Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 02:56:51PM CET: >> ./configure --enable-shared F77=mpif77 ... >> >> where mpif77 translates to >> >> ifort -I/opt/parastation/mpi2-intel/include >> -L/opt/parastation/mp

Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort)

2010-12-16 Thread Christian Rössel
Hi Ralf, Am 12/16/2010 11:19 AM, schrieb Christian Rössel: > Hi Ralf, > > Am 12/15/2010 9:21 PM, schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: >> * Christian Rössel wrote on Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:38:13PM CET: >>> Am 12/10/2010 6:55 PM, schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: Alternatively, the untested patch below should hel

OS/2: command-line length limit (was: Enhanced OS/2 port)

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello again, * KO Myung-Hun wrote on Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:20:32AM CET: > --- libltdl/m4/libtool.m4.org 2010-09-22 17:41:18.0 +0900 > +++ libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 2010-11-27 16:03:50.0 +0900 > @@ -1624,6 +1624,9 @@ >lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=32768 > fi > ;; > + os

Re: PIC flags not found for mpif77(ifort)

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Christian, * Christian Rössel wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:27:23PM CET: > Am 12/16/2010 11:19 AM, schrieb Christian Rössel: > > Am 12/15/2010 9:21 PM, schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: > >> Hmm. Is $GCC = yes for this compiler? That would be surprising. > >> Why else would the new branch not be