Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

[ dropping libtool@ ] Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:00:34PM CEST: > This time as a patch. Ok to push, or did I screw up the texification? Good with minor nits, but allow a day or so for comments from others. Thanks! Cheers, Ralf > Subject: [PATCH] docs: Windows DLLs

Re: libtool-2.2.10: print vs. printf

[ dropping libtool@ ] Hi Markus, * Markus Duft wrote on Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:42:46AM CEST: > On 10/27/2010 08:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> oh, well - good to know that ;) is there some documentation i can > >> refer to wrt to this requirement? it seems we need to adapt some > >> things,

ltmain.sh patch: -all-dynamic option

Hello, I have an application that builds a library for use with LD_PRELOAD, which should only be built dynamically. I have used a modification like the one below to achieve this: *** ltmain.sh.orig Sat Oct 30 11:35:37 2010 --- ltmain.sh Sat Oct 30 11:37:50 2010 *** *** 5173,51

Re: [RFC] w32 and Libtool.

Hi Ralf, Den 2010-10-30 09:15 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:00:34PM CEST: >> This time as a patch. Ok to push, or did I screw up the texification? > > Good with minor nits, but allow a day or so for comments from others. > Thanks! Cool, I agree with all