Charles Wilson wrote:
> The attached, re-re-re-re-revised patch addresses these two issues, but
> is otherwise the same as "take 4".
Ping.
Most recent version is the "take 5" attachment, in this message from two
weeks ago:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-01/msg00232.html
Charles Wilson wrote:
> * tests/cwrapper.test: Add new test for -DLT_DEBUGWRAPPER.
> * doc/libtool.texi [Linking executables]: Mention wrapper
> executables, in addition to wrapper scripts. Add menu referencing
> subsection 'Wrapper executables for programs'.
> [Wrapper executables for programs]: N
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>> How does that sound, as an intermediate plan?
>
> Implemented as attached, which should be applied on top of the -take3 patch.
Ping?
The attached represents the combination of -take3
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-01/msg