[PATCH] Fix typo in libtool install mode usage text

* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_help): Change -inst-prefix to -inst-prefix-dir. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger --- ChangeLog |6 ++ libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh |2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 424

Add lib prefix to library name in the ltdl preloaded symbol lookup

Hi! This is from need-lib-prefix.at: main.exeS.c when the test is run on the tip of the pr-msvc-support branch. lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols[] = { { "@PROGRAM@", (void *) 0 }, {"foo1.lib", (void *) 0}, {"libfoo1_LTX_i", (void *) &foo1_LTX_i},

AWK is required by MS dumpbin symbol pipe.

Hi! This patch make sure AWK is set, even for minimal configure script that doesn't bring it in from elsewhere. Cheers, Peter 2009-01-26 Peter Rosin AWK is required, make sure it is set. * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_CMD_GLOBAL_SYMBOLS: Make sure AWK is set (automake

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in libtool install mode usage text

Hi Mike, * Mike Frysinger wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 05:29:15AM CET: > * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_help): Change -inst-prefix > to -inst-prefix-dir. Thanks. libtool.texi was wrong, too, so I pushed this. I did consider renaming the option to match the documentation instead, and a

Re: Add lib prefix to library name in the ltdl preloaded symbol lookup

Peter Rosin wrote: > This is from need-lib-prefix.at: main.exeS.c when the test > is run on the tip of the pr-msvc-support branch. > > lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols[] = > { { "@PROGRAM@", (void *) 0 }, > {"foo1.lib", (void *) 0}, > {"libfoo1_LTX_i", (void *) &foo1_LTX_i},

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in libtool install mode usage text

On Monday 26 January 2009 14:27:43 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Mike Frysinger wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 05:29:15AM CET: > > * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_help): Change -inst-prefix > > to -inst-prefix-dir. > > Thanks. libtool.texi was wrong, too, so I pushed this. > > I did consider r

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in libtool install mode usage text

* Mike Frysinger wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:23:42PM CET: > On Monday 26 January 2009 14:27:43 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > I did consider renaming the option to match the documentation instead, > > and am not sure which was better; typically, the user never needs to use > > this option. Ha

Re: Add lib prefix to library name in the ltdl preloaded symbol lookup

Den 2009-01-26 21:19 skrev Charles Wilson: Peter Rosin wrote: This is from need-lib-prefix.at: main.exeS.c when the test is run on the tip of the pr-msvc-support branch. lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols[] = { { "@PROGRAM@", (void *) 0 }, {"foo1.lib", (void *) 0}, {"libfoo

Re: Add lib prefix to library name in the ltdl preloaded symbol lookup

Den 2009-01-26 21:54 skrev Peter Rosin: Den 2009-01-26 21:19 skrev Charles Wilson: Peter Rosin wrote: This is from need-lib-prefix.at: main.exeS.c when the test is run on the tip of the pr-msvc-support branch. lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols[] = { { "@PROGRAM@", (void *) 0 },

Re: AWK is required by MS dumpbin symbol pipe.

Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:16:52PM CET: > > This patch make sure AWK is set, even for minimal configure > script that doesn't bring it in from elsewhere. OK for master. Thanks, Ralf > 2009-01-26 Peter Rosin > > AWK is required, make sure it is set. >

Re: Unify line endings in localization test

* Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 08:47:03PM CET: > Den 2009-01-24 14:03, skrev Ralf Wildenhues: >> * Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 02:00:15PM CET: >>> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/24/2009 2:37 AM: >> >> Ah yes, that sounds like it was the problem here. Surely that makes

Re: AWK is required by MS dumpbin symbol pipe.

Den 2009-01-26 22:15 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:16:52PM CET: This patch make sure AWK is set, even for minimal configure script that doesn't bring it in from elsewhere. OK for master. Pushed, thanks! Cheers, Peter

Re: versioning test

Hi Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 05:18:32PM CET: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> Here is a testsuite addition to get some exposure to versioning. >> OK to push (and add Mike to THANKS)? It'd be good if somebody >> proof-read it so there are no silly typos

Re: versioning test

Hello Mike, please keep the mailing list in Cc:, thanks. * Mike Gorchak wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:11:30AM CET: > RW> Here is a testsuite addition to get some exposure to versioning. > RW> OK to push (and add Mike to THANKS)? It'd be good if somebody > RW> proof-read it so there are no sil

Re: versioning test

Hello, Ralf! RW> please keep the mailing list in Cc:, thanks. Sorry, my fault :) RW> libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in RW> archives on your system. Let's find out whether this is due to a RW> deficient "sort" binary or func_basename on QNX: please cd into your R

Re: versioning test

* Mike Gorchak wrote on Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:20:56AM CET: > RW> libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in > RW> archives on your system. Let's find out whether this is due to a > RW> deficient "sort" binary or func_basename on QNX: please cd into your > RW> build tree in

Re: versioning test

Hello, Ralf! > RW>> libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in > RW>> archives on your system. Let's find out whether this is due to a > RW>> deficient "sort" binary or func_basename on QNX: please cd into your > RW>> build tree in which you ran the testsuite. Then ente