Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf!
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:11:45PM CEST:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> [ this is: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.bugs/5319
>>> or http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2006-03/msg00013.html ]
>
>>> Wh
[ let's drop bug-libtool ]
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:03:40PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:11:45PM CEST:
> >> I have no problem with the principle, but as the patch stands there are
> >> idiosyncracies that need ironi
Hallo Ralf!
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:03:40PM CEST:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:11:45PM CEST:
I have no problem with the principle, but as the patch stands there are
idiosyncracies that
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:57:42PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > So could you please list the technical problems you see with this patch,
> > so I can fix them, if any?
>
> Starting to add new features on this side of the 2.0 release is like
> the road to hell (pa
Hallo Ralf,
[adding bug-m4, and quoting generously to remind us to address the
issues you raise]
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:57:42PM CEST:
>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> So could you please list the technical problems you see with this patch,
>>> so
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:00:28PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:57:42PM CEST:
> >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >> ${1+"$@"} 2>/tmp/m4-$$
> >
> > This is very very unfortunate for debugging. I won't see the outp
