Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I'm very sorry it took me so long to write this email.
> Nice to see you are making progress. :)
Doing my best, it's not always so easy to decypher what's
going on in guts of libtool...
Besides, I'm taking revenge by sending a mail that I've been
writing o
Hi Nicolas, others,
This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0
on Tru64 sh is still unsolved. It'd be nice to get a solution into the
next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist.
* Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:59:58PM CEST:
> On Tue, Jun
Hi Peter,
To prevent another week long latency, I'll do a couple of replies,
starting with the easy issues.
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 11:01:37PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > I'm very sorry it took me so long to write this email.
> Besides, I'm taking revenge by send
Hi Peter,
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:35:06PM CEST:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>Incidentally, that kind of "dancing around" is in no way unique to
> >>libtool.
> I just checked that both emacs-21.4 and xemacs-21.4.17 do something like
> (cd $
