Hi Bob, Earnie, Charles, Peter, everyone, :)
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:23:18PM CEST:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
> >I'm not opposed either, I believe it is the default, IIRC. The pw port
> >isn't
> >maintained that I've noticed. The submitter is the auth
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
First, please excuse the cross-post to two mailing lists (and the long
lines). As the mingw-users list is not writable for non-members, you
may want to remove it in followup posts.
[ mingw-users removed]
Are there any issues with this patch? Maybe with respect to cross
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
The comment about pw is an understatement. It seems to me that 'pw'
failed shortly after leaving the gate due to being a rebel without a
cause. It failed years ago and support for it should be removed from
libtool.
Kind of a shame, in that Paul Sokolovsky was the guy t
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Earnie Boyd wrote:
I'm not opposed either, I believe it is the default, IIRC. The pw port isn't
maintained that I've noticed. The submitter is the authority for Cygwin.
The comment about pw is an understatement. It seems to me that 'pw'
failed shortly after leaving the g
Quoting Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| So, is there any reason I should not commit this to Libtool CVS HEAD and
| similarly to branch-1-5?
|
|
| 2005-09-07 Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| * libltdl/m4/lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| So, is there any reason I should not commit this to Libtool CVS HEAD and
| similarly to branch-1-5?
|
|
| 2005-09-07 Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS, _LT_LANG_CXX_CONFI
Hi there,
This is a first patch of a couple with the desire to make Libtool work
better on CYGWIN and MinGW, and to reconcile local changes of their
respective Libtool packages (or common use) into GNU Libtool proper.
First, please excuse the cross-post to two mailing lists (and the long
lines).
