Hi Paolo,
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:44:05PM CEST:
> >As detailedly explained in the comment above this change, `$ECHO' is not
> >necessary instead of `echo'. Also, sed regex `?' is not portable (and
> >in fact not recognized by GNU sed 4.1.2), but \{0,1\} is.
>
> ? is plai
As detailedly explained in the comment above this change, `$ECHO' is not
necessary instead of `echo'. Also, sed regex `?' is not portable (and
in fact not recognized by GNU sed 4.1.2), but \{0,1\} is.
? is plain wrong, since sed uses basic regular expressions. No GNU sed
ever recognized it; t
[ Resend as this is an "OK to apply", not a FYI ]
As detailedly explained in the comment above this change, `$ECHO' is not
necessary instead of `echo'. Also, sed regex `?' is not portable (and
in fact not recognized by GNU sed 4.1.2), but \{0,1\} is.
The nice side-effect of this fix is that it w
As detailedly explained in the comment above this change, `$ECHO' is not
necessary instead of `echo'. Also, sed regex `?' is not portable (and
in fact not recognized by GNU sed 4.1.2), but \{0,1\} is.
The nice side-effect of this fix is that it will work with FC Fortran
where $ac_fcflags_srcext h
